Objective: When we think about using an open-source tool, we want to be sure it’s safe and works well with our company’s tech. We usually find some basic info on the tool’s website and documentation, but we need to dig deeper to see how secure it really is.
Outcome: We carefully assess these security aspects of the tool and give it a score that shows how safe it is overall. The key factors under assessment include:
  1. Binary Artifacts: Stored compiled code or files.
  2. Branch Protection: Limits changes to essential branches.
  3. Dangerous Workflow: Risky automation process.
  4. CI Tests: Continuous Integration tests.
  5. Fuzzing: Test inputs for vulnerabilities.
  6. Licenses: Legal terms for code usage.
  7. Security Policy: Rules for safe development.
  8. Pinned Dependencies: Fixed software versions.
Security Score in the Scoutflo Health Score rates the security of our open-source tool. A higher score means better resilience against external threats and vulnerabilities. We use OpenSSF to fetch this data and calculate the score.
What are your thoughts on security vulnerabilities? Is there anything in particular we should focus on?